[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801251700070.15243@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:01:15 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers Support for Proprierary Modules
On Jan 25 2008 10:31, Jon Masters wrote:
>On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 08:56 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>> So what is needed is an Oops with an explaining message
>> if (kernel_tainted) "blame that proprietary module first",
>> and make sure the user sees that oops even if in X.
>
>The former is actually trivially doable with the module->taints bits. We
>could have the equivalent of a neon flashing "blame this module" sign.
>
>I also agree, we should stop force loading. Incompatible struct module,
>etc. are really bad things to have mapped into a running kernel.
Forceloading should be reserved for developers who know
when a symversion change is safe (which is rare in itself,
but still).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists