[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <479A32B4.9030904@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:04:20 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: trim ram need to check if mtrr is there v3
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Friday 25 January 2008 10:55:31 am Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>>> * Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> [PATCH] x86: trim ram need to check if mtrr is there v3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>>> Looks like the code doesn't check that the CPU *has* MTRRs...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> so more strict check if mtrr is there really.
>>>> bail out if mtrr all blank when qemu cpu model is used
>>>>
>>>> and check if is AMD as early
>>>> also remove 4G less check, according to hpa.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> thanks, applied. Shouldnt we put in an exception for when there is MTRR
>>> support, but they dont cover anything. Still emit a warning - but
>>> booting up real slow is still better than losing all of RAM and crashing
>>>
>>>
>> The problem is re-occuring for me with current x86.git. Looks like v2
>> did the trick, and v3 is broken...
>>
>
> so the ram size less 4g is way out for your case.
>
> again, can you post /proc/mtrrs with v2 patch?
>
It was empty. But ignore this report; it wasn't against the right
version of x86.git.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists