[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <479A5689.80505@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:37:13 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Eduardo Pereira Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
William Irwin <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11 of 11] x86: defer cr3 reload when doing pud_clear()
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> PAE mode requires that we reload cr3 in order to guarantee that
> changes to the pgd will be noticed by the processor. This means that
> in principle pud_clear needs to reload cr3 every time. However,
> because reloading cr3 implies a tlb flush, we want to avoid it where
> possible.
It only matters (for a processor which supports PGE) if we actually use
the namespace in between.
> In huge_pmd_unshare, it is followed by flush_tlb_range, which always
> results in a full cr3-reload tlb flush.
This one makes me nervous, as it feels like a side effect of
implementation, and not a guarantee by design.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists