linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native format.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:11:05 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...umbus.fi>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native
	format.

Hi!

> > > >>I just looked at the ACPI suspend code, and it looks 
> > > >>like it hacks its own identity map at runtime.  Pavel, 
> > > >>am I reading that code right?
> > > >
> > > >Yes, I think so, I believe we do it on both 32 and 64 
> > > >bit now.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > So the background to this... we need an identity map to 
> > > trampoline at early boot, obviously, but we'd like it to 
> > > not stick around more than necessary.  We have 
> > > zap_low_mappings() now but it's not really sufficient.
> > > 
> > > Secondary SMP processors need these mappings during 
> > > trampolining -- presumably including CPU hotplug -- and 
> > > I'm suspecting it might simply make sense to use a 
> > > separate set of page tables (with both the identity and 
> > > the kernel map) for trampolining and just keep them 
> > > around.  That way they would be usable for ACPI as well.
> > 
> > That would enable some cleanups, yes.
> 
> Speaking of cleanups, the following one is applicable IMO.

ACK... and BTW ack for that deferred device removal series.

							Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/