| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200801252147.27254.lenb@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:47:26 -0500 From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> To: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Q: x86 suspend/hibernation code consolidation On Friday 25 January 2008 19:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to move the 64-bit suspend/hibernation files from arch/x86/kernel to > arch/x86/power, modify the names of the 32-bit files already in > arch/x86/power and update the Makefiles accordingly, but there are some changes > queued for merging that touch the files in question. > > When is the right time for making changes like that? > > Rafael In Cambridge, when we discussed cleanups that touch a lot of files but have no functional change -- somebody suggested that right after rc1 closes is a good time. The reasoning was that they would not conflict with the functional changes in rc1. However, I recall Linus saying something about "Andrew is special" WRT permission to push cleanups after the rc1 window; so I don't know what the final ruling was -- if there was such a ruling. -Len -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists