linux-kernel - Re: Q: x86 suspend/hibernation code consolidation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200801270036.41249.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:36:39 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Q: x86 suspend/hibernation code consolidation

On Saturday, 26 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > I'd like to move the 64-bit suspend/hibernation files from arch/x86/kernel to
> > arch/x86/power, modify the names of the 32-bit files already in
> > arch/x86/power and update the Makefiles accordingly, but there are some changes
> > queued for merging that touch the files in question.
> 
> I have similar patch producing hibernation_*.S, I can send it as a
> base.

Well, it probably will have to be rebased anyway.  That's the problem: what to
base it on to avoid conflicts.

> Moving it soon  would be nice :-).

Yes, but I'm afraid not earlier than after the ACPI suspend tree is merged.

> As I'm in process of rewriting arch/x86/kernel/acpi/ , I'd prefer that
> not to be moved from under me.

I'm not going to touch that now. :-)

Greetings,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/