linux-kernel - Re: using LKML for subsystem development (was Re: Linux 2.6.24)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8125.1201318113@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:28:33 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <cate@...eee.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: using LKML for subsystem development (was Re: Linux 2.6.24)

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:42:43 +0100, Stefan Richter said:

> Even if you only look at the Subject: and number of postings in a
> thread, how to judge whether there is a stability risk for the next -rc
> in the making, without experience or personal interest in the domain?

My general rule of thumb is "if my laptop has one of those on it, I look
at it more, even if I don't have the foggiest idea how it works".  Of
course, this only works for threads with semi-sane Subject: headers....

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped