[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020801271300g316b87bgea6beb265b5c62d3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:00:29 +0200
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc: "Jim Houston" <jim.houston@...r.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "Tejun Heo" <htejun@...il.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lib/idr.c: initialize struct idr_layer
Hi Vegard,
On Jan 27, 2008 10:07 PM, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com> wrote:
> I am testing my kmemcheck patches, and it has come up with a couple of
> uses of uninitialized memory in lib/idr.c. These are (the line numbers
> may differ slightly):
[snip]
> @@ -39,12 +39,16 @@ static struct idr_layer *alloc_layer(struct idr *idp)
> {
> struct idr_layer *p;
> unsigned long flags;
> + int i;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&idp->lock, flags);
> if ((p = idp->id_free)) {
> idp->id_free = p->ary[0];
> idp->id_free_cnt--;
> - p->ary[0] = NULL;
> + p->bitmap = 0;
> + for(i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(p->ary); ++i)
> + p->ary[i] = NULL;
> + p->count = 0;
But aren't these zeroed by idr_cache_ctor() already?
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&idp->lock, flags);
> return(p);
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists