[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <479D3287.1050604@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:40:23 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git3: Major annoyance during suspend/hibernation
on x86-64 (bisected)
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> No, this isn't the WARN_ON().
>
>> this does have the feel of being scheduling related, but are you
>> absolutely sure about the precise identity of the patch?
>
> Actually, not quite. That's why I have verified it and found that another
> patch is really responsible for the issue, namely:
>
> commit 82a1fcb90287052aabfa235e7ffc693ea003fe69
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Date: Fri Jan 25 21:08:02 2008 +0100
>
> softlockup: automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
Are you getting a bunch of prints from the softlockup detector in dmesg?
I wonder if the detector can detect a long timeout caused by suspend and
resume and if not is triggering false positives?
-- Steve
>
> Reverting this commit (it reverts with some minor modifications) fixes the
> problem for me.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists