[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <479DB7BE.4040106@qumranet.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:08:46 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH][RFC] SVM: Add Support for Nested Paging in
AMD Fam16 CPUs
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> I find it non-descriptive, and it reminds me of another hypervisor.
>> I suggest 'tlp' for two-level paging.
>>
>
> That has its own ambiguity; without other context it reads like
> "two-level pagetable". Anyway, using the same term for the same thing
> is not a bad idea.
>
>
What annoys me about hap and hvm is that it comes from a
paravirtualization viewpoint, where pv is the default model, and
hardware extensions are an optional addition. With kvm it's the other
way round: the base model is full virtualization, and paravirtualization
is an optional add-on. I'd rather call traditional shadow paging
"software-assisted paging".
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists