[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080128094912.1848eacd@gaivota>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:49:12 -0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
To: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@...akeasy.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
v4l-dvb-maintainer@...uxtv.org,
Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] 2.6.25 regression: VIDEO_DEV=y/m, I2C=n
compile error
> Maybe the kernel headers should provide a couple macros for testing
> configs, since people get it wrong over and over again?
>
> #define CONFIG_ON(x) (defined(CONFIG_##x) || defined(CONFIG_##x##_MODULE))
> #define CONFIG_AVAIABLE(x) (defined(CONFIG_##x) || (defined(MODULE) && defined(CONFIG_##x##_MODULE)))
Seems a good idea to me.
>
> Not sure what to do about VIDEO_DEV=y, I2C=m. It should be possible except
> for this function.
I don't see much sense on allowing v4l2-common being in-kernel, while having
I2C as module. Also, creating a separate module for just a single function
seems to be overkill.
IMO, in this specific case, v4l2-common should also be a module. Not sure,
however,the better syntax on Kconfig. Once, someone suggested a very weird
syntax, like:
depends on I2C if I2C
Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists