[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <01c801c861ae$c2349990$41a8400a@bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:07:38 +0900
From: "Takashi Sato" <t-sato@...jp.nec.com>
To: "David Chinner" <dgc@....com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ext3 freeze feature
Hi,
Thank you for your comments.
> That's inherently unsafe - you can have multiple unfreezes
> running in parallel which seriously screws with the bdev semaphore
> count that is used to lock the device due to doing multiple up()s
> for every down.
>
> Your timeout thingy guarantee that at some point you will get
> multiple up()s occuring due to the timer firing racing with
> a thaw ioctl.
>
> If this interface is to be more widely exported, then it needs
> a complete revamp of the bdev is locked while it is frozen so
> that there is no chance of a double up() ever occuring on the
> bd_mount_sem due to racing thaws.....
My patch has the race condition as you said.
I will fix it.
Cheers, Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists