[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <479DEE10.6060203@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:00:32 +0100
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: trenn@...e.de
CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allocate pnp resources dynamically via krealloc - working
version
On 28-01-08 15:21, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> I think I know what is going on.
> While pnpbios and pnpacpi theoretically do not have limits, isapnp has
> spec restrictions (AFAIK, I have not read this up, but taken over from
> previous implementation...).
> Therefore in isapnp I wanted to stay with:
> #define PNP_MAX_PORT 8
> #define PNP_MAX_MEM 4
> #define PNP_MAX_IRQ 2
> #define PNP_MAX_DMA 2
> but I have forgotten to malloc one portion for each at init time, or
> even better one portion as soon as one is needed.
Yup.
> As said, isapnp is more or less untested, thanks a lot for trying out.
> I will send an updated version soon.
I"m not sure of the flow of things by the way but if it makes better/nicer
code to just pretend that ISAPnP is also unlimited then I'd say to simply do
so. ISAPnP is getting obsolete anyway, not anything to optimise for...
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists