linux-kernel - Re: Problem with ata layer in 2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <200801281244.10662.gene.heskett@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:44:10 -0500
From:	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
To:	Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>
Cc:	Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ide Mailing list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with ata layer in 2.6.24

On Monday 28 January 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Monday 28 January 2008, Zan Lynx wrote:
>>On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:50 -0500, Calvin Walton wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:35 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> > On Monday 28 January 2008, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>>> > >Unfortunately we also see:
>>> > > > [   48.285456] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
>>> > > > [   48.549725] ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:00.0[A] -> Link [APC4]
>>> > > > -> GSI 19 (level, high) -> IRQ 20 [   48.550149] NVRM: loading
>>> > > > NVIDIA UNIX x86 Kernel Module  169.07  Thu Dec 13 18:42:56 PST 2007
>>> > >
>>> > >We have no way of debugging that module, so please try 2.6.24 without
>>> > > it.
>>> >
>>> > Sorry, I can't do this and have a working machine.  The nv driver has
>>> > suffered bit rot or something since the FC2 days when it COULD run a
>>> > 19" crt at 1600x1200, and will not drive this 20" wide screen lcd
>>> > 1680x1050 monitor at more than 800x600, which is absolutely butt ugly
>>> > fuzzy, looking like a jpg compressed to 10%.  The system is not usable
>>> > on a day to basis without the nvidia driver.
>>>
>>> You should probably give the nouveau[1] driver a try, if only for
>>> testing purposes; if you are running an NV4x (G6x or G7x) card in
>>> particular, it works a lot better than the nv driver for 2d support.
>>>
>>> 1. http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/InstallNouveau
>>
>>But nouveau is much less stable than nv.  For testing purposes, go with
>>stable.
>
>I believe at this point, its moot.  I captured quite a few instances of that
>error message while rebooting the last time, all of which occurred long
>before I logged in and did a startx (I boot to runlevel 3 here), so the
>kernel was NOT tainted at that point.  That dmesg has been posted and some
>questions asked.
>
>As this has gone on for a while, it seems to me that with 14,800 google hits
>on this problem, Linus should call a halt until this is found and fixed. 
> But I'm not Linus.  I'm also locking up for 30 at a time, & probably ready
> for reboot #7 today.
>
>>I'm not sure why it won't run his screen though.  I can use nv to run a
>>1920x1200 laptop LCD.  It *is* dog slow (although nouveau was not any
>>better with a NV17 / 440-Go -- render support for AA fonts seems to be
>>missing), but it does work.

I've been trying to run a long selftest on that drive, but the constant 
reboots are fscking that up.  I have attached the last smartctl -a output, 
indicating that the test was aborted probably from all the resets that are 
being issued, the last one froze me for around 5 minutes but I haven't 
rebooted yet.  Its attached.  Can anyone see if there is actually anything 
wrong with the drive?  If a boot will last long enough for the -t long to 
complete, then it passes with no errors, but this was interrupted now for the 
3rd time.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Well begun is half done.
		-- Aristotle

View attachment "smart.log" of type "text/x-log" (9051 bytes)