linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Moving spinlock to struct usb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080128042449.GA6374@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:24:49 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Romit Dasgupta <romlinux@...il.com>
Cc:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Moving spinlock to struct usb_hcd

On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:50:36AM +0530, Romit Dasgupta wrote:
> Hi,
>                  Should I go ahead and submit the patch with the usual
> "signed-off" thingie? Or is it totally useless patch that is going to
> be ignored?

Let's see some proof that it actually helps, and then we can evaluate if
it is needed or not :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/