[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801282126.45751.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:26:44 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...umbus.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native format.
On Monday, 28 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > /*
> > > > * Swap suspend & friends need this for resume because things like the intel-agp
> > > > * driver might have split up a kernel 4MB mapping.
> > > > */
> > > > -char __nosavedata swsusp_pg_dir[PAGE_SIZE]
> > > > +char swsusp_pg_dir[PAGE_SIZE]
> > >
> > > thanks, applied.
>
> Sorry, this is subtle and I've overlooked it before.
>
> (I thought you were only changing ifdef).
>
> Now you memcpy() over pg_dir when that pgdir is in use during swsusp
> resume.
It is not. swsusp hasn't been using swsusp_pg_dir for several months.
Hence, the patch. :-)
> Granted, you memcpy() with same data that already are there,
> but it may still do some funny effects.
>
> Hmm, but same argument applies to lower levels of paging in 64-bit and
> PAE cases, and we still do that memcpy-over-active-pagetables there...
> :-(.
Actually, no. We only do that with the kernel code mapping which should be
safe as long as TLBs are not flushed (and they aren't).
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists