linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add iSCSI iBFT support (v0.4.5)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200801281547.00865.konrad@darnok.org>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:46:58 -0500
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek <konrad@...nok.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Doug Maxey <dwm@...yolf.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, greg@...ah.com, darnok@....org,
	pjones@...hat.com, konradr@...hat.com, konradr@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	randy.dunlap@...cle.com, lenb@...nel.org, mike.anderson@...ibm.com,
	dwm@...tin.ibm.com, arjan@...radead.org, michaelc@...wisc.edu,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add iSCSI iBFT support (v0.4.5)

> iBFT is not platform-independent; it only makes sense on platforms with
> ACPI (and even then, just barely; ACPI is a poor fit for it and it was
> probably "integrated" with ACPI for political reasons.)

The spec just mentions that iBFT table has to be "compatible with an ACPI 
table format" and nothing else. In reality I've only tested this on x86_64 
and i386. We can limit it to be X86 || IA64 but I wouldn't make it dependent 
on ACPI - as this data does not necessarily have to be exported via ACPI.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/