[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080127213257.0889c523.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:32:57 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jkenisto@...ibm.com,
ananth@...ibm.com, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] kprobes: kretprobe user entry-handler (updated)
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:52:48 +0530 Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@...il.com> wrote:
> This is a repost of a patch which was reviewed earlier at:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/13/58 (thanks to Jim Keniston and Srinivasa for their review comments). This provides support to add an optional user defined callback to be run at function entry of a kretprobe'd function. It also modifies the kprobe smoke tests to include an entry-handler during the kretprobe sanity test.
>
Neither the changelog nor the newly-added documentation explain why Linux
needs this feature. What will it be used for??
> +1.3.2 Kretprobe entry-handler
> +
> +Kretprobes also provides an optional user-specified handler which runs
I think "caller-specified" would be a better term here. Generally "user"
refers to Aunt Tillie sitting at the keyboard.
> +/* Timestamp function entry. */
> +static int entry_handler(struct kretprobe_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + struct my_data *data;
> +
> + if(!current->mm)
> + return 1; /* skip kernel threads */
gargh, what's happened to checkpatch lately? It failed to notice the
missing space.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists