[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1201482923.24645.1.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:15:23 +0800
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Avuton Olrich <avuton@...il.com>,
Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linux-Kernel," <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alsa-Devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: a7839e96 (PNP: increase max resources) breaks my ALSA intel8x0
sound card
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 08:50 +1100, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Avuton Olrich wrote:
> >
> > With v2.6.24 my second ALSA sound device stopped working.
>
> Hmm. Why is PnP ACPI called before PCI probing? That seems to be the
> problem here - we should *never* have any firmware allocation block known
> hardware BARs, they should only be blocking new dynamic allocations.
>
> Hmm. I wonder if the problem is that ACPIPnP marks the regions busy. That
> would be wrong. They shouldn't be busy, they should just "exist".
>
> A busy region will stop a "request_region()" (incorrect for this case -
> thats' not what the PnP resurce allocation should be all about), but an
> *existing* resource will just stop a new resource being dynamically
> assigned to that address (not not stop a known resource from using it).
>
> So maybe the ACPIPnP allocation is doen at the right moment, just doing
> the wrong thing..
This is because the region is declaimed in motherboard device. That is
BIOS thinks the region is reserved for motherboard. Maybe we should
blacklist the system too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists