[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080129170230.209662753@mvista.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:02:30 -0800
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fix workqueue plist init to include a spinlock
The lock field in plist_head_init() is used for debugging the plist,
and if a NULL is sent in it spews constant errors with debugging enabled ..
So I added what looks like the correct spinlocks into the plist_head_init().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.24/kernel/workqueue.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24.orig/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ linux-2.6.24/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static void insert_wq_barrier(struct cpu
INIT_WORK(&barr->work, wq_barrier_func);
__set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(&barr->work));
- plist_head_init(&barr->worklist, NULL);
+ plist_head_init(&barr->worklist, &cwq->lock);
plist_head_splice(&cwq->worklist, &barr->worklist);
barr->cwq = cwq;
init_completion(&barr->done);
@@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ init_cpu_workqueue(struct workqueue_stru
cwq->wq = wq;
spin_lock_init(&cwq->lock);
- plist_head_init(&cwq->worklist, NULL);
+ plist_head_init(&cwq->worklist, &cwq->lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&cwq->more_work);
cwq->barrier = NULL;
init_waitqueue_head(&cwq->work_done);
--
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists