[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080129191107.GP12400@plap3.qlogic.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:11:07 -0800
From: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>
To: "Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" <Mike.Miller@...com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"k-ueda@...jp.nec.com" <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>,
"j-nomura@...jp.nec.com" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at drivers/block/cciss.c:1260! (with recent
linux-2.6 tree)
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Miller, Mike (OS Dev) wrote:
> Jens wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jens Axboe [mailto:jens.axboe@...cle.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:54 PM
> > To: Andrew Vasquez
> > Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; Miller, Mike (OS Dev);
> > k-ueda@...jp.nec.com; j-nomura@...jp.nec.com
> > Subject: Re: kernel BUG at drivers/block/cciss.c:1260! (with
> > recent linux-2.6 tree)
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29 2008, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 29 2008, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Here the final snippet that was logged:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ 12.724997] input: USB HID v1.01 Mouse [HP
> > Virtual Keyboard] on usb-0000:01:04.4-1
> > > > > > > [ 12.728971] usbcore: registered new interface
> > driver usbhid
> > > > > > > [ 12.732866] drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:
> > v2.6:USB HID core driver
> > > > > > > [ 12.741172] TCP cubic registered
> > > > > > > [ 12.744506] NET: Registered protocol family 1
> > > > > > > [ 12.744884] NET: Registered protocol family 17
> > > > > > > [ 12.749217] Freeing unused kernel memory: 228k freed
> > > > > > > [ 12.885823] cciss rq: dev cciss/c0d0: type=2, flags=104c8
> > > > > > > [ 12.888929]
> > > > > > > [ 12.888930] sector 6510615555426900570, nr/cnr 0/0
> > > > > > > [ 12.892895] bio ffff81042f130730, biotail
> > ffff81042f130730, buffer 0000000000000000, data
> > 0000000000000000, len 0
> > > > > > > [ 12.896895] cdb: 12 00 00 00 fe 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ah ok, I see the problem... cciss is overriding the
> > data_len for
> > > > > > BLOCK_PC requests, hence it does not complete them properly.
> > > > > > Hmm. Does this work?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/block/cciss.c
> > b/drivers/block/cciss.c index
> > > > > > ef50068..b6fa52e 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/block/cciss.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/block/cciss.c
> > > > > > @@ -2524,7 +2524,6 @@ after_error_processing:
> > > > > > resend_cciss_cmd(h, cmd);
> > > > > > return;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > - cmd->rq->data_len = 0;
> > > > > > cmd->rq->completion_data = cmd;
> > > > > > blk_complete_request(cmd->rq); }
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Things look good so far -- with the patch above I can
> > finally boot
> > > > > the machine.
> > > >
> > > > Cool, sorry about that. Will get that applied asap. So after this
> > > > patch was applied, you didn't see any debug messages from
> > > > blk_dump_rq_flags() anymore, right?
> > >
> > > That's correct. I've yet to see any additional debug-messages from
> > > blk_dump_rq_flags().
> >
> > Great, thanks for confirming. It does look like a clear bug
> > in cciss, it just got exposed now that it uses proper end
> > request handling. We never need to clear ->data_len, since
> > for blk_fs_request() it will be cleared on init. So just
> > setting a residual count there for blk_fs_request() like
> > cciss does is fine.
>
> Just so I'm clear: just removing the one line is enough to resolve the problem?
That's correct. The only other change to cciss.c in my tree is where
the BUG() call was replaced with a call to blk_dump_rq_flags():
@@ -1257,7 +1257,8 @@ static void cciss_softirq_done(struct request *rq)
#endif /* CCISS_DEBUG */
if (blk_end_request(rq, (rq->errors == 0) ? 0 : -EIO, blk_rq_bytes(rq)))
- BUG();
+ blk_dump_rq_flags(rq, "cciss rq");
+// BUG();
spin_lock_irqsave(&h->lock, flags);
cmd_free(h, cmd, 1);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists