linux-kernel - Re: "Default Linux Capabilities" default in 2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Xine.LNX.4.64.0801291347460.29383@us.intercode.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:48:09 +1100 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Matt LaPlante <kernel1@...erdogtech.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "Default Linux Capabilities" default in 2.6.24

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Matt LaPlante wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:12:01 -0600
> Matt LaPlante <kernel1@...erdogtech.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I'm doing a make oldconfig with the new 2.6.24 kernel.  I came to the prompt for "Default Linux Capabilities" which defaults to No:
> > 
> > ---
> >  Default Linux Capabilities (SECURITY_CAPABILITIES) [N/y/?] (NEW) ?
> > ---
> > 
> > However the help text recommends saying Yes.
> > 
> > ---
> >  This enables the "default" Linux capabilities functionality.
> >  If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer Y.
> > ---
> > 
> > Does this seem incongruous?  Also, what's the "question"? :)
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Matt LaPlante
> 
> Anyone?

I think this should be default y.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/