linux-kernel - Re: sections mismatches: How to mark new false positives?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080129215632.GA15644@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:56:32 +0100
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: sections mismatches: How to mark new false positives?

> 
> I would suggest the following fix.

Looked a bit closer.
We have more warnings in this area and I see
code where we previously remove the __devinit
annotation.

It looks like we should take all the HOTPLUG only
functions from probe.c and move them elsewhere
(hotplug.c or probe_hotplug.c) and then
only build this file if HOTPLUG is enabled.

This seems like a straightforward solution.
If no-one beats me I will look into that in the weekend.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/