[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1201675591.7246.3.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:46:31 -0500
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: chuck.lever@...cle.com, nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/27] NFS: Use local caching [try #2]
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 03:25 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > This patch really ought to be broken into more manageable atomic
> > changes to make it easier to review, and to provide more fine-grained
> > explanation and rationalization for each specific change via
> > individual patch descriptions.
>
> Hmmm.... I broke the patch up as Trond stipulated - at least, I thought I
> had.
>
> In many ways this request doesn't make sense. You can't do NFS caching
> without all the appropriate bits, so logically they should be one patch.
> Breaking it up won't help git-bisect since the option to enable all this is
> the last (or nearly last) patch.
That depends entirely on what you are tracking. At this point in time,
I'm completely uninterested in debugging cachefs, but _very_ interested
in tracking and debugging changes to core NFS code.
Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists