[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1201682801.28547.162.camel@lappy>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:46:41 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/22 -v7] Add basic support for gcc profiler
instrumentation
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 22:15 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> +int register_mcount_function(struct mcount_ops *ops)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&mcount_func_lock, flags);
> + ops->next = mcount_list;
> + /* must have next seen before we update the list pointer */
> + smp_wmb();
That comment does not explain which race it closes; this is esp
important as there is no paired barrier to give hints.
> + mcount_list = ops;
> + /*
> + * For one func, simply call it directly.
> + * For more than one func, call the chain.
> + */
> + if (ops->next == &mcount_list_end)
> + mcount_trace_function = ops->func;
> + else
> + mcount_trace_function = mcount_list_func;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mcount_func_lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists