linux-kernel - Re: e1000 full-duplex TCP performance well below wire speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:18:04 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Bruce Allen <ballen@...vity.phys.uwm.edu>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Henning Fehrmann <henning.fehrmann@....mpg.de>,
	Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@....mpg.de>,
	Bruce Allen <bruce.allen@....mpg.de>
Subject: Re: e1000 full-duplex TCP performance well below wire speed

Bruce Allen <ballen@...vity.phys.uwm.edu> writes:

> Dear LKML,

You forgot to specify what user programs you used to get to the
benchmark results. e.g. if the user space does not use large 
enough reads/writes then performance will be not optimal.

Also best you repost your results with full information
on netdev@...r.kernel.org

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/