[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801301923450.13036@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:27:57 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
cc: sfrench@...ba.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove smbfs
On Jan 29 2008 00:08, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
>I remember that there were some small things missing in CIFS for
>completely replacing the unmaintained smbfs when we discussed removing
>smbfs back in 2005 due to smbfs being unmaintained.
>
>CIFS has improved since, smbfs is still unmaintained, and it's becoming
>time to finally remove smbfs.
Negative. CIFS as of 2.6.24-rc7 still does not support Windows 98,
or at least, the mount command I tried was not the right one:
mount -t cifs //WIN98/c /mnt -o guest,sec=none
(It is a test share with a null password open for anyone.) I am running
out of options..
CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists