[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080130185446.GF29368@does.not.exist>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:54:46 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Cc: Giridhar Pemmasani <pgiri@...oo.com>,
Pavel Roskin <proski@....org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, rms@....org
Subject: Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:26:00PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
>> IANAL, but I have serious doubts whether putting some glue layer
>> between the GPL'ed code and the code with a not GPL compatible licence
>> is really a legally effictive way of circumventing the GPL.
>
> It may depend on the details of the "code with a not GPL compatible
> licence".
>
> It's pretty hard to argue that a binary driver written for another OS is
> a derivative work of the linux kernel.
Read the paragraph starting with "These requirements apply to the
modified work as a whole." of the GPLv2.
IANAL, and I would therefore ask a lawyer whether, and if yes under
which circumstances, shipping a binary driver written for another OS
dynamically linked into the Linux kernel would not be a criminal offense.
> Chris
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists