lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1201721578.4037.39.camel@cinder.waste.org>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:32:58 -0600
From:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To:	Heikki Orsila <shdl@...alwe.fi>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt


On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 16:14 +0200, Heikki Orsila wrote:

> > > Imo,
> > > "same exact C compiler" is just bad language, because C compilers are 
> > > always "exact". "exactly same C compiler" would do.
> > 
> > No, "exactly same C compiler" doesn't parse well in English.
> 
> "Same exact C compiler" does not mean what you try to say.

Actually, it does. It is perfectly idiomatic English.

"Use the exact same C compiler." -> OK, idiomatic
"Use the same exact C compiler." -> OK, idiomatic
"Use the exactly same C compiler." -> very awkward
"Use exactly the same C compiler." -> formally correct

http://www.bartleby.com/68/24/2324.html
-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ