| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:32:52 +0100 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: 2.6.24-git7: section mismatches woes On Wednesday, 30 of January 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 07:50:43PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I get these messages, the majority of which seem to be false-positives: > ... > > modpost: Found 35 section mismatch(es). > > To see additional details select "Enable full Section mismatch analysis" > > in the Kernel Hacking menu (CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH). > Looking in to these atm. > > > > > and if I compile the kernel with CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH, it breaks resuming > > from RAM. > > The only functional difference when you enable CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH is the > addition of the -fno-inline-functions-called-once to CFLAGS. > So we have some code somewhere that breaks if it is not inlined by gcc. > > It would be nice to sort out where. > If you have a rough idea where to look No, I don't. It looks like there's somewhere in arch/x86, since I ruled out kernel/power and drivers/acpi already. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists