[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47A187AE.1000809@bull.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:32:46 +0100
From: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@...l.net>
To: pierre.peiffer@...l.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 05/15] IPC/semaphores: remove one unused
parameter from semctl_down()
pierre.peiffer@...l.net wrote:
> From: Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@...l.net>
>
> semctl_down() takes one unused parameter: semnum.
> This patch proposes to get rid of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@...l.net>
> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
> ---
> ipc/sem.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/ipc/sem.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/ipc/sem.c
> +++ b/ipc/sem.c
> @@ -882,8 +882,8 @@ static inline unsigned long copy_semid_f
> * to be held in write mode.
> * NOTE: no locks must be held, the rw_mutex is taken inside this function.
> */
> -static int semctl_down(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid, int semnum,
> - int cmd, int version, union semun arg)
> +static int semctl_down(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid,
> + int cmd, int version, union semun arg)
> {
> struct sem_array *sma;
> int err;
> @@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semctl (int semid, i
> return err;
> case IPC_RMID:
> case IPC_SET:
> - err = semctl_down(ns,semid,semnum,cmd,version,arg);
> + err = semctl_down(ns, semid, cmd, version, arg);
> return err;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
>
Looks like semnum is only used in semctl_main(). Why not removing it
from semctl_nolock() too?
Regards,
Nadia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists