lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:45:32 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	marcin.slusarz@...il.com
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] udf: fix udf_build_ustr

On Wed 30-01-08 22:03:52, marcin.slusarz@...il.com wrote:
> udf_build_ustr was completely broken when
> size >= UDF_NAME_LEN - 1 or size < 2
> 
> nobody noticed because all callers set size
> to acceptable values (constants)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> ---
>  fs/udf/unicode.c |   12 ++++++------
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/udf/unicode.c b/fs/udf/unicode.c
> index f969617..f4e54e5 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/unicode.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/unicode.c
> @@ -47,16 +47,16 @@ static int udf_char_to_ustr(struct ustr *dest, const uint8_t *src, int strlen)
>   */
>  int udf_build_ustr(struct ustr *dest, dstring *ptr, int size)
>  {
> -	int usesize;
> +	u8 usesize;
  What is the purpose for this? Why not just leave int there? Arithmetics
is usually best done in ints if that's possible...
>  
> -	if ((!dest) || (!ptr) || (!size))
> +	if (!dest || !ptr || size < 2)
>  		return -1;
>  
> -	memset(dest, 0, sizeof(struct ustr));
> -	usesize = (size > UDF_NAME_LEN) ? UDF_NAME_LEN : size;
> +	usesize = min_t(size_t, size - 2, sizeof(dest->u_name));
>  	dest->u_cmpID = ptr[0];
> -	dest->u_len = ptr[size - 1];
> -	memcpy(dest->u_name, ptr + 1, usesize - 1);
> +	dest->u_len = usesize;
> +	memcpy(dest->u_name, ptr + 1, usesize);
> +	memset(dest->u_name + usesize, 0, sizeof(dest->u_name) - usesize);
  Hmm, after parsing what the standard says (ugh), I don't think the code is
wrong (at least I think you made it incorrect). The caller of
udf_char_to_ustr() specifies length of the field (not length of the
string). Now, in the last character of the field is stored the number of
characters in the string and in the first character of the field is stored
encoding of the string. So the original code seems correct.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ