[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080131123741.GA10469@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:37:41 +0100
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
linux390@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: x86 arch updates also broke s390
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:24:54AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 02:33 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > <-- snip -->
> > >
> > > ...
> > > CC arch/s390/kernel/asm-offsets.s
> > > In file included from
> > > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/arch/s390/kernel/asm-offsets.c:7:
> > > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h: In
> > > function 'spin_needbreak':
> > > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h:1931:
> > > error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_spin_is_contended'
> > > make[2]: *** [arch/s390/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
> > >
> > > <-- snip -->
> >
> > Defining GENERIC_LOCKBREAK in arch/s390/Kconfig takes care of it. I'll
> > cook up a patch and queue it in git390.
>
> thanks!
Yeah thanks, don't know what happened with this, sorry. I thought I
had defined it for all SMP capable ones, so maybe it was a quilt
error or something on my part.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists