linux-kernel - Re: High wake up latencies with FAIR_USER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1201784423.28547.302.camel@lappy>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:00:23 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>
Cc:	vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: High wake up latencies with FAIR_USER_SCHED


On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 13:49 +0100, Guillaume Chazarain wrote:
> On 1/31/08, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> > Does something like this help?
> 
> I made it compile by open coding undefined macros instead of
> refactoring the whole file.
> But it didn't affect wake up latencies.

Ah, well, what can one expect from mid-night ideas :-)

Thanks for testing!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/