[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080131150746.GB11996@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:07:46 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>
Cc: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add a list for custom page fault handlers.
* Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi> wrote:
> > static inline int notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
> > @@ -588,6 +636,9 @@ void __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
> > if (notify_page_fault(regs))
> > return;
> >
> > + if (handle_custom_pf(regs, error_code, address))
> > + return;
> > +
>
> This is the non-trivial change that I really want to test before
> submitting again. The call site of the handlers changes, and vmalloc
> related faults reach the custom handlers. I don't think this would be
> a problem for mmiotrace, but I don't know enough to be sure. I guess
> using vmalloc'd memory from a page fault handler would be doomed,
> anyway, so no point worrying about it, right?
could you please send us a patch for the whole mmiotrace kernel-side
feature, so that we can have a look at the general structure of this?
(and the interaction with change_page_attr(), etc.) Even if it's not
functional (and wont even build/boot) at the moment. Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists