[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080131013415.GA3768@dario.dodds.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:34:15 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@...ian.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: sfrench@...ba.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove smbfs
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 02:47:17AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > smbfs has the unfortunate quality of momentum. A lot of users aren't
> > aware of CIFS at all since smbfs basically does what they need it to
> > do. Some extra warning for those users would be nice.
> And many users will start whining loudly that the not deprecated driver
> (in this case cifs) has this or that bug not before the patch to finally
> remove the deprecated feature got applied or at least posted.
> And will demand that it therefore does not get removed.
We've had about 3 of these in Debian since deciding to cut it from the
upcoming release. (The kicker for us was the samba security update that
wasn't tested with smbfs as a client.) The key regressions of interest
relative to smbfs seem to be:
- lack of DFS support
- lack of netbios name resolution for UNC share names
The former seems to be a kernel issue whose resolution is in progress, and I
think the latter would have to be addressed in the userspace mount tools?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@...ntu.com vorlon@...ian.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists