[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1FE6DD409037234FAB833C420AA843EC78C75A@orsmsx424.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:34:23 -0800
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Mike Travis" <travis@....com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Linux Kernel Development" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux/PPC Development" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
<linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>, <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: x86/non-x86: percpu, node ids, apic ids x86.git fixup
> hm, as far as i could check, on ia64 UP the .percpu section link
> difference was the only ia64 difference i could find out of those
> changes. Could you try to copy a 2.6.24 include/asm-generic/percpu.h,
> include/asm-ia64.h and include/linux/percpu.h into your current tree,
> and see whether that boots? If yes, then it's the percpu changes. The
> patch below does this ontop of very latest -git - and it builds fine
> with your UP config with a crosscompiler.
Applied that patch and UP kernel built ok, and then crashed in the
same place with the memset() to a user-looking address from kmem_cache_alloc()
So the percpu changes are innocent ... something else since 2.6.24 is
to blame. Only 5749 commits :-) I'll start bisecting.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists