linux-kernel - Re: e1000 full-duplex TCP performance well below wire speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0801311328030.14403@trinity.phys.uwm.edu>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:37:32 -0600 (CST)
From:	Bruce Allen <ballen@...vity.phys.uwm.edu>
To:	Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>
cc:	SANGTAE HA <sangtae.ha@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: e1000 full-duplex TCP performance well below wire speed

Hi Bill,

>>> I see similar results on my test systems
>>
>> Thanks for this report and for confirming our observations.  Could you
>> please confirm that a single-port bidrectional UDP link runs at wire
>> speed?  This helps to localize the problem to the TCP stack or interaction
>> of the TCP stack with the e1000 driver and hardware.
>
> Yes, a single-port bidirectional UDP test gets full GigE line rate
> in both directions with no packet loss.

Thanks for confirming this.  And thanks also for nuttcp!  I just 
recognized you as the author.

Cheers,
 	Bruce
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/