[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47A23F1C.7080809@inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:35:24 +0100
From: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Purpose of numa_node?
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 5:42 AM, Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr> wrote:
>
>> It works fine on regular machines such as dual opterons. However, I
>> noticed recently that it was wrong on some quad-opteron machines (see
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=119072400008538&w=2) because something
>> is not initialized in the right order. But I haven't tested 2.6.24 on
>> this hardware yet, and I don't know if things have changed regarding this.
>>
>
> that will depend if you dsdt have _PXM for your pci root bus.
> otherwise you will get all -1
>
Have a look at the above link. I don't get -1. I get 0 everywhere, while
I should get 1 for some devices. And if I unplug/replug a device using
fakephp, numa_node becomes correct (1 instead of 0). This just looks
like the code is there but things are initialized in the wrong order.
Brice
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists