linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] remove smbfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801310310220.13320@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:23:25 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
cc:	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	sfrench@...ba.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove smbfs


On Jan 31 2008 12:33, David Newall wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Jan 30 2008 12:53, Steve French wrote:
>>   
>>> I have mounted to Windows98 a few months ago with no problems (other
>>> than a few restrictions like you can't set the file times via utimes).
>>> For mounts to Windows98 note that you have to specify the server
>>> netbios name on the mount (since it is not the same as the DNS name).
>>> In your example your would need to specify "servernetbiosname=WIN98"
>>> in the mount options (until mount.cifs autoretries with
>>> servernetbiosname assumed to be the beginning of the UNC name - note
>>> that later servers have a dummy netbios name that is used so this
>>> mount option is only needed for OS/2 and Win9x).
>>
>> Ok that works. I had tried "netbiosname" but not "servernetbiosname"
>> (only fuzzy memories from the last win98 encounter and the suggestion
>> to use netbiossomething).
>
>Apparently CIFS lacks an adequate man page (otherwise Jan would have
>discovered servernetbiosname for himself.)  That's sufficient reason to
>keep smbfs, and just to be radical, why not remove cifs until it's
>properly documented?  Man pages are essential.

smbfs does not seem to do NT/XP mounts, so that's kinda problematic
too, as fun as it sounds :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/