linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: define OBJCOPYFLAGS explicitly for each target.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080131224505.GB24974@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:45:05 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: define OBJCOPYFLAGS explicitly for each target.


* Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk> wrote:

> Do this rather than defining a global version and overriding it in 
> almost all cases in order to make subsequent patches simpler.

thanks Ian - i've picked up #1, #2 and #4 from your series. Once #3 is 
OK to Peter i'll add that too. (#4, the bumping of the version needs 
#3 to be meaningful.)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/