[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801311508080.23624@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:09:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>
cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
Izik Eidus <izike@...ranet.com>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, steiner@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
daniel.blueman@...drics.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmu notifiers #v5
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > pagefault against the main linux page fault, given we already have all
> > needed serialization out of the PT lock. XPMEM is forced to do that
>
> pt lock cannot serialize with invalidate_range since it is split. A range
> requires locking for a series of ptes not only individual ones.
Hmmm.. May be okay after all. I see that you are only doing it on the pte
level. This means the range callbacks are taking down a max of 512
entries. So you have a callback for each pmd. A callback for 2M of memory?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists