linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/6] Change RIO function mpc85xx_ to fsl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:04:22 +0800
From:	"Zhang Wei" <Wei.Zhang@...escale.com>
To:	"Kumar Gala" <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	<mporter@...nel.crashing.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/6] Change RIO function mpc85xx_ to fsl_ .

All right, I'll give you another patch for 86xx dts file. :)

 Btw: Why the PCI and other nodes were moved from SOC? Just for clear?
If they are moved out, their register address must use full address not
offset address.

Thanks!
Wei.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@...nel.crashing.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:44 PM
> To: Zhang Wei
> Cc: mporter@...nel.crashing.org; 
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Change RIO function mpc85xx_ to fsl_ .
> 
> Can you post a device tree update as well.
> 
> The older patches on the list for the 86xx .dts should NOT 
> put the rio  
> node under the soc.  It should be at the same level as PCI.
> 
> - k
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/