[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47A2A5D8.4080700@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:53:44 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...do.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Feature Removals for 2.6.25
>
> ---------------------------
>
> What: CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING
> When: June 2006
> Why: Config option is there to see if gcc is good enough. (in january
> 2006). If it is, the behavior should just be the default. If it's not,
> the option should just go away entirely.
> Who: Arjan van de Ven
>
> Patch submitted to Arjan, maybe 2.6.25?
Ingo picked it up, but no rush for .25, .26 is fine for this as well
>
> What: Unused EXPORT_SYMBOL/EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL exports
> (temporary transition config option provided until then)
> The transition config option will also be removed at the same time.
> When: before 2.6.19
> Why: Unused symbols are both increasing the size of the kernel binary
> and are often a sign of "wrong API"
> Who: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
this is an ongoing work; symbols get marked unused and then garbage collected
when they're due; for example akpm has several of that kind in his pile right now
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists