| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:10:09 +0100 From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> To: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com> CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, jeff.chua.linux@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ole@....pl, cups-bugs@...ysw.com, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: cups slow on linux-2.6.24 David Newall wrote: > I'm not debating that checksums are wrong. The question was how and > where? It's not as if there are any unreliable communication paths in a > loopback interface, so it's surprising that they could be wrong. How? Where? > As I said, loopback doesn't perform full checksum calculation. Its simply an optimization, nothing to worry about ... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists