[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <386072610802010141g340cdb14gcd244ab87ffc855e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:41:14 +0800
From: "Bryan Wu" <cooloney.lkml@...il.com>
To: "David Brownell" <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
"Bryan Wu" <bryan.wu@...log.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [spi-devel-general] [PATCH 0/6] [Blackfin] SPI driver updates
On Feb 1, 2008 4:50 AM, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> I've forwarded these to Andrew, with my signoff and updated comments.
> You still need to work on having your patch descriptions match up
> to what the patches actually do...
>
Thanks a lot, I will try to make it more clearer next time.
> Patches 3-5 in this series seem to have a common thread: waiting
> until BIT_STAT_SPIF is set before moving to the next step of the
> transfer. Next time something similar happens, I'd rather see just
> one patch addressing the issue on all code paths ... not three small
> patches that only fix it for a few of the code paths.
>
OK, I will try to merge these same bug fixing into one patch.
> Also, two of those three patches describe their updates as fixing
> a "regression", or "reverting" the code. Was this a bug that came
> in those patches you wanted to merge to 2.6.24? If so, shouldn't
> those regression fixes go into the stable series?
>
Yes, I agree with you. Actually, I intend to send out these bug fixing
patch ASAP, but we want to make sure our tester verify this bug was
fixing first.
Thanks
-Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists