linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] mm: fix a section mismatch warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:30:07 +0800
From:	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Alessandro Guido <alessandro.guido@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] mm: fix a section mismatch warning

On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:38:53PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>Hi WANG.
>
>On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 01:25:17AM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
>> 
>> This patch fix this mismatch warning from mm:
>> 
>> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.meminit.text+0x37f): Section mismatch in reference from the function free_area_init_core() to the function .init.text:setup_usemap()
>> modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es).
>> 
>> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
>> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>> 
>> ---
>> 
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index b2838c2..8a9ae3c 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -3321,7 +3321,7 @@ static inline int pageblock_default_order(unsigned int order)
>>   *   - mark all memory queues empty
>>   *   - clear the memory bitmaps
>>   */
>> -static void __meminit free_area_init_core(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>> +static void __init free_area_init_core(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>>  		unsigned long *zones_size, unsigned long *zholes_size)
>>  {
>>  	enum zone_type j;
>> @@ -3445,7 +3445,7 @@ static void __init_refok alloc_node_mem_map(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP */
>>  }
>>  
>> -void __meminit free_area_init_node(int nid, struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>> +void __init free_area_init_node(int nid, struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>This change make me a bit unnerved. HAve you checked all callers?
>I simple grep shows 46 hits in the tree.

I use cscope to do the check. ;)

free_area_init_node is the only caller of free_area_init_core,
but free_area_init_node has more than one callers that didn't
mark __init/__meminit.

>
>It is always good to explain why the change you do is OK,
>for no other reasons than to show you really thought it through.

OK. Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/