linux-kernel - Re: Are Section mismatches out of control?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:10:52 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Are Section mismatches out of control?

On Friday 01 February 2008 11:47:18 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> James said in a related posting that the Section mismatch
> warnings were getting out of control.

My question is: where are crashes? If the sections were
really in such bad shape and since we poison (and sometimes
even unmap) init after boot we should in theory see a lot 
of oops reports from this if there were really accesses to
them after boot.

Where are they?


> The total figure for this build is 106 warnings.

The interesting question is how many true bugs are in these warnings.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/