[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080201133755.GA25620@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:37:55 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...ru>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...ru>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] hrtimer_nanosleep: use -EINTR, not -ERESTARTNOHAND
hrtimer_nanosleep:
/* Absolute timers do not update the rmtp value and restart: */
return -ERESTARTNOHAND;
This is not right, -ERESTARTNOHAND means we will do restart if there is no
in fact pending signal, and worse, this restart will use the same unchanged
"__user *rmtp" parameter.
Use -EINTR instead.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
--- MM/kernel/hrtimer.c~HRT_RMTP~ 2008-01-27 17:07:39.000000000 +0300
+++ MM/kernel/hrtimer.c~HRT_RMTP 2008-02-01 13:43:52.000000000 +0300
@@ -1359,7 +1359,7 @@ long hrtimer_nanosleep(struct timespec *
/* Absolute timers do not update the rmtp value and restart: */
if (mode == HRTIMER_MODE_ABS)
- return -ERESTARTNOHAND;
+ return -EINTR;
if (rmtp) {
rem = ktime_sub(t.timer.expires, t.timer.base->get_time());
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists