[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080201135125.GA16249@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:51:25 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
Mika Penttil? <mika.penttila@...umbus.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native
format.
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `wakeup_start':
> > : undefined reference to `swsusp_pg_dir'
> >
> > config attached.
>
> I see. CONFIG_HIBERNATION && CONFIG_ACPI -> CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP and the
> Makefile in arch/x86/kernel/acpi/ wants to build wakeup.S, which is
> not necessary. Hmm.
>
> We can do a couple of things:
> (1) make wakeup_$(BITS).o depend on CONFIG_SUSPEND (alone)
> This will build it if CONFIG_SUSPEND is set, but CONFIG_ACPI is not
> (still, that's consistent with the change in question).
> (2) make wakeup_$(BITS).o depend on CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_ACPI
> (3) define CONFIG_ACPI_SUSPEND depending on ACPI and SUSPEND and
> make wakeup_$(BITS).o as well as swsusp_pg_dir depend on that (most
> elegant)
>
> Which one do you prefer?
no strong preference here - pick the one you like best and send a patch
please :-)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists